Digital evidence for UK family, criminal, employment, corporate and civil disputes

Every word.
Verified.

Your WhatsApp, email and text history already holds the truth of your case. LegallyHeard reads all of it, both sides, under identical rules, and hands you a neutral, court-style record where every quotation is machine-verified against the source. In minutes, not months.

The demo runs entirely in your browser. Nothing is uploaded.

What a solicitor bills to read a large case £8,000 to £24,000
20 to 60 hours of reading at the £400/hr mid-market rate, before any advice begins
What LegallyHeard charges, flat, per case £49 to £2,499
One payment for your case, no hourly clock. Court Bundle is £2,499. Solicitors and teams: £149 per user per month (£75 legal aid).
Every quotation in every report is programmatically verified verbatim against your source export. SHA-256 integrity hashes throughout.

Minutes, not months.

A hundred thousand messages read, organised and charted in minutes, with every quotation checked against your source file before it is printed.

Page one, plainly

Who we are. What we do. How we do it.

01 Who we are

A neutral UK evidence technology company, built from direct experience of family, civil and criminal litigation, where evidence overload drives delay and cost. We are not a law firm and we take no side. When thousands of pages become impossible to manage, we turn evidence into clarity.

02 What we do

We turn raw message exports, WhatsApp, email, SMS, iMessage, Messenger, Instagram, Telegram, Snapchat, LinkedIn, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Skype, Google Chat, Discord, Viva Engage, into one dated timeline, pattern analysis in both directions, and a court-style PDF report with an exhibit index and integrity hashes.

03 How we do it

Parse every message. Apply identical rules to both parties. Verify every quotation against the source before it is printed. Keep context around every flashpoint so nothing is cherry-picked. Deep AI review happens only with your explicit, informed consent.

The problem

Family cases drown in evidence before they ever reach a hearing.

A typical disputed divorce or child-arrangements case now produces thousands of messages, emails and recordings. Combing through it by hand is slow, expensive work, and it is the part of a case where hours accumulate fastest.

1

Too much data

Chats, emails, photos and recordings sit in different places. Nothing speaks to anything else. Patterns are invisible.

2

Too little time

Reading the record can take 20-60 hours: £8,000-£24,000 of professional time that a client would rather see spent on strategy and advocacy. We do the reading so that time goes further. Our flat fees start at £49.

3

Too much uncertainty

Critical messages are missed, misread or presented out of order. Bundles get rejected. Hearings get adjourned.

The platform

Three pillars. Every channel merged. One evidence story.

R

Read

Ingest WhatsApp exports, EML/MBOX email, Android SMS/MMS XML, iMessage/iMazing exports, Messenger and Instagram JSON, Telegram HTML or JSON, Snapchat and LinkedIn exports, workplace exports from Slack, Microsoft Teams, Skype, Google Chat, Discord and Viva Engage with every channel and thread kept, plus evidence files. Preserved originals and normalised records feed one case timeline.

A

Analyse

The local overview uses transparent rules to surface activity, timing and possible patterns. For opted-in Court Bundle matters, the Deep Fact-Finding Review examines the full record in overlapping context windows and produces structured findings for deterministic checking and synthesis.

G

Graph & reference

Auto-build the case timeline. Cross-reference messages with statements, photos with locations, recordings with their transcripts. Export a court-ready bundle.

Two levels of review

Local overview first. Deep review only with informed consent.

Local rule-based overview

Fast, transparent processing on our own server for timelines, counts and rule-based indicators. Chat content is not sent to an AI provider for this overview.

Deep Fact-Finding Review

A premium, white-glove Court Bundle option for large or complex records. With explicit opt-in, the full record is reviewed through overlapping context windows for AI structured findings, then deterministically deduplicated and synthesised. Direction and directedness are classified, every quoted extract is checked exactly against the source, and the report is neutral and two-sided.

Not self-serve or fully automated. We disclose the proposed AI provider, data flow and estimated provider cost before asking for consent. No chat is sent unless you opt in.

How it works

Three steps to a court-ready bundle.

01

Drop in your evidence

Upload WhatsApp .txt/.zip, EML/MBOX, Android SMS/MMS XML, iMazing or LinkedIn CSV, an Apple Messages chat.db (we ask which conversation), Messenger/Instagram JSON, Snapchat JSON, Telegram exports in HTML or JSON, or workplace exports from Slack, Microsoft Teams, Skype, Google Chat, Discord and Viva Engage. Select several sources together or add them later.

02

We do the heavy reading

The local overview handles rule-based timelines and indicators. Where a scoped Court Bundle includes the consent-gated Deep Fact-Finding Review, AI-assisted reading is followed by deterministic dedupe, synthesis and exact source-quote verification. The service surfaces and organises; it never decides who is right.

03

Export a court-ready bundle

Receive an indexed PDF, source manifest, annotated timeline and key-events summary. A review report is an aid to fact-finding and solicitor review: it is not itself evidence or a court document, and any filing or reliance should be decided with your legal adviser.

Pricing teaser

Pay once, per case. From a £49 taster to a full court bundle.

What LegallyHeard charges, per case: £49 to £2,499. One payment for your case, no hourly clock. Court Bundle is £2,499. Solicitors and teams: £149 per user per month (£75 legal aid). The £400/hr figure you see elsewhere on this page is what traditional review costs, not what we charge.

Taster (one-off)£49
Case Review, every source (once)£499
Court Bundle, hearing-ready£2,499
Professional, per user per month£149
Why LegallyHeard

Built for evidence-heavy disputes, not contract review.

LegallyHeard ChatParse ThreadRecap Reviewed by hand @ £400/hr
WhatsApp / SMS analysis✓ All four pillarsPDF exportAI summaryManual
Email ingestManual
Audio/video transcription✓ AI draft transcriptsVoice-to-text onlyOutsourced
Photo metadata + OCRManual
Cross-source timeline mergeManual
SHA-256 hash-chain exportSometimes
Court-ready paginated bundle✓ Court BundleAlways
Starting price£49 one-offFree previewFree preview£300-£500/hr (their hourly rate)
Voices (illustrative, for demo)

What family teams say.

"I used to spend two evenings a week reading WhatsApp exports. LegallyHeard gave me the timeline in twenty minutes."
Family solicitor, illustrative quote Illustrative
"My ex's pattern of late handovers was obvious once it was graphed. The hearing took an hour, not three."
Litigant in person, illustrative quote Illustrative
"The SHA-256 hash on every page meant the bundle was accepted first time. That alone paid for the year."
Boutique family law partner, illustrative quote Illustrative
Legal guides

Know the law behind the allegation.

Plain-English guides to the four allegations that decide most contested family cases in England & Wales, the statutes, the leading cases, and the message evidence that actually proves (or disproves) a pattern.

Serious Crime Act 2015 s76

Coercive & controlling behaviour

A pattern crime, proved by escalation, monitoring language and message volume over months, not by single screenshots.

Read the guide →
Domestic Abuse Act 2021

Domestic abuse & child arrangements

PD12J, fact-finding hearings, children as victims in their own right, and why courts prefer the complete dated record over selected fragments.

Read the guide →
Protection from Harassment Act 1997

Harassment & stalking

"Course of conduct" means counting: contact attempts per day, and everything after "please stop contacting me".

Read the guide →
FJC guidance 2024

Parental alienation

No syndrome, no shortcut, a question of fact. What "alienating behaviours" means and what the record can show.

Read the guide →

Try a chat. Right now. In your browser.

Drop in a WhatsApp .txt export or use our sample. Nothing leaves your machine. The demo shows you authors, timeline, sentiment swings and the ten moments your case probably turns on.